Calypso engineering finish line
Policies that keep the org coherent
name: Calypso engineering finish overview: Close the Calypso engineering coherence gap first (arrangement, WT bulkheads, vestibules, tagged opening schedule), then complete the visual detail pass so CAD matches the blueprint claims and reads as a working freighter. todos:
- id: arrangement-wt
content: Full-OAH eng + 9m hold void; WT-BH walls with stationMeters status: completed
- id: vestibules
content: VEST-BR/P/S spaces + 3 framed PDs per T junction status: completed
- id: opening-schedule
content: Tag parity PD/AH/CD/RAMP + W_open/ClearWidth on openings status: completed
- id: blueprint-sync
content: Fix hold 9m + schedule/dims to match CAD tags status: completed
- id: detail-openings
content: Door/hatch leaves + ramp steps in DrawOpeningFrame status: completed
- id: detail-props-hull
content: Module prop kits + hull rivets/nacelle caps status: completed
- id: verify-export
content: Headless tour re-export + README arrangement/detail notes status: completed isProject: false
Problem
finalize_calypso_transport delivered the program (rooms, wall gaps, hollow cargo, props). Blueprints claim a structural GA that CAD does not emit. calypso_detail_pass adds leaves/props/rivets on top of that mismatch.
Decision locked: engineering topology + opening schedule first, then detail-pass visuals on that corrected model. No DrawTriangle3D / OBJ import.
Canon (single source)
| Item | Rule |
|---|---|
| Envelope | 65 × 20 × 12 m · registry ST-7749-63325116 |
| Hab stack | Decks +1 / 0 / −1 fwd–mid only (deck spacing 4.0 m, room clear ≈ 3.6 m) |
| Engineering | One full-OAH void aft of hab (STN ~38.8–47), not three stacked rooms |
| Hold | One hollow volume 22 × 19 × **9** m aft of eng (STN ~47–AP); “full OAH” means continuous void, height **9 m** (not 12) |
| Corridors | Twin port/stbd + cross; ClearWidth **2.0 m** (Rev G `corrFill`) |
| Junctions | Vestibules with N framed openings — never open T by deleting walls |
| Opening dims | `W_open` / `H_open` / `H_sill` = structural cut; `ClearWidth` / `ClearHeight` = liner ≤ cut |
Phase 1 — Arrangement + WT topology in generator
Update CalypsoRevGGenerator.cs:
- Replace stacked eng rooms with one continuous engineering void spanning deck −1 floor → +1 ceiling (or documented OAH band), walls only on plan perimeter + WT faces.
- Hold stays one hollow cargo system; align STN/aft extent to 22 m LOA; keep catwalk / armored BH / ramp.
- Emit WT bulkheads as named walls (
wt-bh-eng@ STN≈38.8,wt-bh-hold@ STN≈47) with properties{ watertight: true, stationMeters }. - Add vestibule spaces at VEST-BR (bridge T), VEST-P, VEST-S: small rect solids; route corridor ends into vestibules; place 3 framed openings per T (legs), not wall deletions.
Phase 2 — Opening schedule parity
- Tag every ship opening with schedule IDs matching calypso-blueprint-master:
PD-01…,AH-P/S,PD-C1…5,PD-20/21(corr→eng, ClearWidth 2.0),PD-22/23(eng side ~0.9),CD-P/S,RAMP. - Store on opening entities:
tag,W_open,H_open,H_sill,ClearWidth,ClearHeight,hostWallId,connects. - Twin WT corridor doors at eng BH (today: one centered eng door).
- Keep
OpeningDerivation.Applyfor baseline gaps; document that full Boolean ring/sill/seal remains spec → CAD later (renderer leaf ≈ leaf only).
Phase 3 — Blueprint cleanup (coherence only)
Trim calypso-blueprint-master.canvas.tsx:
- Hold note: 22×19×9 continuous void (not “FULL OAH 12 m”).
- BP-03: label corridor PD cut as
W_openmatching ClearWidth 2.0 for WT/corr doors; personnel doors ~0.8–0.9 separately. - Opening schedule rows must match generator tags 1:1.
Phase 4 — Detail pass (existing plan, on corrected model)
In CalypsoRenderer.cs, complete calypso_detail_pass:
DrawOpeningFrame: leaf byOpeningType(door/hatch/ramp steps); armored tint for CD.- Expand
DrawCompartmentProps/DrawHollowShaftkits (cabin UI/webbing, galley run, airlock hooks, triple trunk, eng tanks, cargo gantry/cleats/rails). - Orbit: hull panel seams + rivet dots; nacelle end caps.
- Headless re-export + README “detail pass” + arrangement/opening schedule note.
Done when
- Eng = one full-height machinery volume; hold = one 9 m continuous void; hab = three decks only fwd of WT-BH-eng.
- Vestibules exist; corridor T junctions use 3 PDs.
- Opening tags in
.cadjsonmatch blueprint schedule. - Tour PNGs show leaves + denser props + riveted orbit hull.
- Blueprint hold/opening notes no longer contradict CAD.
flowchart TD
canon["Canon table STN/heights"] --> gen["RevGGenerator arrangement"]
gen --> wt["WT-BH + vestibules"]
wt --> sched["Tagged opening schedule"]
sched --> derive["OpeningDerivation gaps"]
derive --> render["Detail pass leaves/props/rivets"]
render --> png["Headless tour"]
sched --> bp["Blueprint schedule sync"]